1) Failure to dispose of beneficial interest
- Where a beneficial interest is not disposed of effectively, a resulting trust will arise in favor of the grantor E.g. Vandervell v IRC
- Where an express trust fails for any reasons such as no beneficiary under the trust, purpose of the trust is void, trust is void for uncertainty, a resulting trust will arise in favor of the grantor E.g. Re Diplock
3) Purchase in the name of another
- Where a property is purchased in the name of one but with the money of another and there is no express intention of who the beneficial owner is, a resulting trust will arise in favor of the one that provided the money. (Dyer v Dyer)
- Because equity presumes that it was A's intention that B to whom the legal title is conveyed, should hold it on trust for A.
- Exception: if property is bought in the name of other for an improper or illegal purpose and purchaser disclosed such purpose, a resulting trust would not arise (Yim Bo Ying v Chung Iu Warm)
- This presumption can be rebutted
- E.g. evidence that the property was intended as a gift (Fulltrend v Longer Year)
- Presumption of advancement will rebut the presumption in Dyer v Dyer
沒有留言:
張貼留言